Cars for Kurtas: 5 Surprising Truths Inside the India-EU 'Mother of All Deals'
- Abhijeet Bhinde
- 4 days ago
- 4 min read

After nearly two decades of complex negotiations, India and the European Union have finally concluded their long-awaited Free Trade Agreement (FTA). Hailed by European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen as the "Mother of All Deals," the pact marks a historic moment in global trade and diplomacy. But beyond the triumphant headlines, the agreement contains a series of surprising and impactful details that reveal its true scope. This post goes beyond the surface to uncover the five most critical takeaways from this landmark deal.
"PM Modi, we did it!... We delivered the mother of all deals..." - Ursula Von Der Leyen, President of the European Commission
The Deal’s Real Target Isn’t Tariffs—It’s China and Washington.
The strategic calculus for both India and the EU is clear: this agreement serves as a critical instrument to diversify supply chains and reduce economic dependence on China, a concept widely referred to as "de-risking." It is a calculated move to build resilience in an era of increasing geopolitical fragmentation.
The pact also serves as a crucial hedge against rising protectionism and trade uncertainties, particularly the potential for new tariff hikes from the United States under the Trump administration. By strengthening their own economic ties, both sides are securing access to a large, rules-based market.
Ultimately, the partnership is driven by a shared ambition to forge a "multipolar order." In a world increasingly shaped by great-power rivalry, this deal is designed to preserve the strategic autonomy and influence of both India and the EU.
"In a period of systemic turbulence, both India and the EU are seeking a multipolar order that preserves their strategic autonomy amid intensifying great-power rivalry."
The Great Swap: European Cars and Wine for Indian Textiles and Jobs
This "great swap" addresses long-standing demands from both sides, balancing market access for European industrial goods with opportunities for India's labor-intensive sectors.
EU Gains:
Vehicles: India's steep import duties on European cars will be dramatically reduced from the current 110% down to just 10%. This reduction applies to a quota of 250,000 units, making European brands significantly more affordable for Indian consumers.
Alcoholic Beverages: Tariffs on wine will be slashed from a prohibitive 150% to 20% for premium ranges and 30% for medium ranges. Similarly, duties on spirits will fall from 150% to 40%.
India Gains:
Labor-Intensive Exports: In return, the EU will grant zero-duty access for India's key labor-intensive exports. Tariffs will be eliminated on nearly $33.5 billion of Indian goods, including textiles, apparel, leather, footwear, gems, and jewellery. These sectors currently face duties as high as 12% in the EU market.
Trade is Just the Tip of the Spear for a New Security Alliance.
Here, the FTA cleverly acts as a Trojan horse for a much deeper strategic realignment, embedding economic integration within a comprehensive security and technology framework. Key areas of enhanced cooperation include:
Security and Defence: The new EU-India Security and Defence Partnership expands cooperation in crucial areas like maritime security, cyber defence, and counter-terrorism, signaling a deeper alignment on regional and global security challenges.
Technology and Innovation: The creation of the EU-India Trade and Technology Council (TTC) is designed to boost collaboration on semiconductors, digital technologies, and Artificial Intelligence, ensuring both partners remain at the forefront of technological advancement.
Mobility and Talent: A new Memorandum of Understanding will facilitate the mobility of Indian professionals, students, and researchers to Europe, addressing skill shortages in the EU while creating streamlined legal pathways for Indian talent.
Connectivity: Both sides have expressed shared support for the India-Middle East-Europe Economic Corridor (IMEC), a strategic project aimed at strengthening logistics, enhancing trade resilience, and creating more efficient supply chains.
For a "Free Trade" Deal, Its Biggest Success Was What It Excluded.
This demonstrates the practical and political limits of international trade negotiations, where core domestic interests are often non-negotiable. Despite the broad scope of tariff elimination, certain "sacred cows" were deliberately kept off the table. This strategic ring-fencing of agriculture was a crucial prerequisite for the deep tariff cuts seen in the 'Great Swap' of industrial and consumer goods, allowing negotiators to achieve breakthroughs that had been impossible for over a decade.
India's Protections: To protect the livelihoods of its large population of small and marginal farmers, India has "ring-fenced" its dairy, cereals, poultry, and certain fruit and vegetable sectors from deep tariff cuts.
EU's Protections: The EU also retained tariffs on some of its most sensitive agricultural products, including beef, sugar, and rice, shielding its domestic producers from increased competition.
A Major Climate Clash Is Still Brewing
CBAM is a carbon charge, or fee, that the EU will impose on imports from carbon-intensive sectors like iron, steel, and aluminium. This mechanism highlights a fundamental clash in perspective between the two partners.
The EU's View: Brussels frames CBAM as a necessary policy to prevent "carbon leakage"—a scenario where European companies move production to countries with less stringent environmental standards to avoid carbon costs. It sees the policy as essential for maintaining the integrity of its climate goals.
India's View: New Delhi views CBAM as a discriminatory non-tariff barrier. It argues that the policy unfairly penalizes developing economies, imposes significant compliance costs, and harms the global competitiveness of its key industrial exports.
Crucially, CBAM will become operational regardless of the FTA. This unresolved tension over CBAM serves as the most significant test for the new strategic partnership, pitting the EU's domestic climate agenda directly against India's developmental priorities and its role as a voice for the 'Global South'.
Conclusion: A New Pillar in a Shaky World?
Ultimately, the India-EU agreement should be understood not as a mere trade pact, but as a deliberate act of geopolitical architecture. It represents a choice by two of the world's largest democratic powers to deepen their integration and build a partnership that can navigate an increasingly turbulent global landscape.
"This is not just a trade agreement, it is a blueprint for shared prosperity." - Prime Minister Narendra Modi
As India and the EU forge this deeper bond, will their partnership become a stabilizing new pillar in a turbulent global order, or will underlying frictions over issues like carbon pricing ultimately test its limits?

Comments